Comparing the Performance of the Wolf Algorithm with Three other Meta-Heuristic Algorithms (Bees, Biogeography-Based, Chicken Swarm)

Authors

  • Hoda Dalili Yazdi Department of Industrial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran‎.
  • Reza Tavakkoli Moghaddam Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran‎. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6757-926X
  • Golriz Bolhasani Department of Industrial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran‎.

Keywords:

Grey wolf optimization algorithm, Bees algorithm, Biogeography-based optimization algorithm, Chicken swarm optimization algorithm‎, Criteria functions

Abstract

Nowadays, meta-heuristic algorithms have made significant contributions to achieving approximate solutions to optimization problems. It is important to choose a suitable algorithm for each problem, as an algorithm can be appropriate for one type of problem and, at the same time, inappropriate for another one. In this paper, an attempt has been made to compare the Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) algorithm with 3 modern optimization algorithms (bees algorithm, Biogeography-Based Optimization (BBO) algorithm and Chicken Swarm Optimization (CSO) algorithm). By utilizing 9 criteria functions, the performances of these algorithms in terms of reaching the global optimal point and also the time of reaching have been investigated. In order to make the correct comparison, the selected algorithms are all among the ones which are derived from the foraging behaviors of living organisms.

References

‎[1] ‎ Tavakoli Moghadam, R., Nourozi, N., Kalami, S. M., & Salamat Bakhsh, A. (2013). Meta heuristic ‎Algorithms. Islamic Azad University. (In Persian). https://www.fadakbook.ir/product/19594/‎

‎[2] ‎ Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014). Grey wolf optimizer. Advances in engineering software, ‎‎69, 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007‎

‎[3] ‎ Simon, D. (2008). Biogeography-based optimization. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 12(6), ‎‎702–713. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2008.919004‎

‎[4] ‎ Pham, D. T., Ghanbarzadeh, A., Koç, E., Otri, S., Rahim, S., & Zaidi, M. (2006). The bees algorithm—a ‎novel tool for complex optimisation problems. In Intelligent production machines and systems (pp. 454–‎‎459). Elsevier.‎

‎[5] ‎ Xing, B., & Gao, W.-J. (2014). Innovative computational intelligence: a rough guide to 134 clever algorithms ‎‎(Vol. 62). Springer.‎

‎[6] ‎ Meng, X., Liu, Y., Gao, X., & Zhang, H. (2014). A new bio-inspired algorithm: chicken swarm ‎optimization. Advances in swarm intelligence: 5th international conference, ICSI 2014, Hefei, China, ‎proceedings, part I 5 (pp. 86-94). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-‎‎11857-4_10%0A%0A‎

‎[7] ‎ Dixon, L. C. W. (1978). The global optimization problem: an introduction. Towards global optimiation 2, ‎‎1–15. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1573105974275467776‎

Published

2024-08-09

How to Cite

Comparing the Performance of the Wolf Algorithm with Three other Meta-Heuristic Algorithms (Bees, Biogeography-Based, Chicken Swarm). (2024). Metaheuristic Algorithms With Applications, 1(1), 12-19. https://maa.reapress.com/journal/article/view/18