A Global Interaction–Inspired Metaheuristic for Neural Network Optimization in Geological Modeling by World Algorithm

Authors

  • Peyman Rivandi * Department of Computer Engineering, Politecnico, Toino Italy.
  • Fateme Davoodian Department of Computer Engineering, La.C., Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.48313/maa.v1i1.31

Abstract

The growing complexity of geological modeling demands intelligent optimization strategies capable of handling nonlinear, multi-modal, and data-scarce environments. This study introduces world, a novel global interaction–inspired metaheuristic algorithm designed for neural network optimization in geoscientific applications. Rooted in the ecological dynamics of interdependent entities, the World algorithm integrates adaptive learning, social influence mechanisms, and environmental feedback loops to achieve dynamic balance between exploration and exploitation. The proposed framework was implemented within an Automated Deep Learning (AutoDL) environment (Auto-Keras) and evaluated across three key geoscientific prediction tasks: lithology classification, shear wave velocity estimation, and Total Organic Carbon (TOC) quantification. Two benchmark datasets—from the North Sea and Horn River Basin—were utilized to ensure geological diversity. Comparative analysis against established optimizers, including Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Bayesian Optimization (BO), and Tree-structured Parzen Estimator (TPE), demonstrated that world consistently achieved faster convergence, higher accuracy, and superior generalization capability. Empirical results revealed an average 12–18% improvement in predictive performance and a 30% reduction in training time, confirming the algorithm’s robustness and computational efficiency. Moreover, its dynamic adaptation strategy significantly mitigated the risk of premature convergence commonly observed in traditional metaheuristics.

Keywords:

World algorithm, Metaheuristic optimization, Neural network Optimization, Geological modeling, Automated machine learning

References

  1. [1] Dokeroglu, T., Sevinc, E., Kucukyilmaz, T., & Cosar, A. (2019). A survey on new generation metaheuristic algorithms. Computers & industrial engineering, 137, 106040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106040

  2. [2] Daliri, A., Roudposhti, K. K., Alimoradi, M., Sheikhha, M., Saraei, M. R. S., & Mohammadzadeh, J. (2025). Optimized categorical boosting for gastric cancer classification using heptagonal reinforcement learning and the water optimization algorithm. 2025 7th international conference on pattern recognition and image analysis (IPRIA) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPRIA68579.2025.11263556

  3. [3] Santhanam, G., Ryu, S. I., Yu, B. M., Afshar, A., & Shenoy, K. V. (2006). A high-performance brain-computer interface. Nature, 442(7099), 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04968

  4. [4] Alimoradi, M., Azgomi, H., & Asghari, A. (2022). Trees social relations optimization algorithm: A new swarm-based metaheuristic technique to solve continuous and discrete optimization problems. Mathematics and computers in simulation, 194, 629–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.12.010

  5. [5] Lamtar-Gholipoor, M., Fakheri, S., & Alimoradi, M. (2024). Artificial neural network TSR for optimization of actinomycin production. Big data and computing visions, 4(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.22105/bdcv.2024.474793.1184

  6. [6] Daliri, A., Asghari, A., Azgomi, H., & Alimoradi, M. (2022). The water optimization algorithm: A novel metaheuristic for solving optimization problems: The water optimization algorithm: A novel metaheuristic for solving optimization problems. Applied intelligence, 52(15), 17990–18029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03397-4

  7. [7] Daliri, A., Alimoradi, M., Zabihimayvan, M., & Sadeghi, R. (2024). World hyper-heuristic: A novel reinforcement learning approach for dynamic exploration and exploitation. Expert systems with applications, 244, 122931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122931

  8. [8] Alimoradi, M., Zabihimayvan, M., Daliri, A., Sledzik, R., & Sadeghi, R. (2022). Deep neural classification of darknet traffic. Artificial intelligence research and development (pp. 105–114). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220323

  9. [9] Bhuvaneshwari, M., Kanaga, E. G. M., Anitha, J., Raimond, K., & George, S. T. (2021). A comprehensive review on deep learning techniques for a BCI-based communication system. In Demystifying big data, machine learning, and deep learning for healthcare analytics (pp. 131–157). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821633-0.00013-1

  10. [10] Chaudhary, U., Birbaumer, N., & Curado, M. R. (2015). Brain-machine interface (BMI) in paralysis. Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 58(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2014.11.002

  11. [11] Ala-Kulju, K. (2022). Bayesian reduced rank regression for assessment of age and cognition related effects on stable patterns in EEG recordings [Thesis]. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/server/api/core/bitstreams/c30c1b33-699c-462a-81cb-a6d0b927ebc4/content

  12. [12] Thompson, D. E., Quitadamo, L. R., Mainardi, L., Laghari, K. U. R., Gao, S., Kindermans, P. J., ... & Huggins, J. E. (2014). Performance measurement for brain–computer or brain–machine interfaces: A tutorial. Journal of neural engineering, 11(3), 035001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/11/3/035001

  13. [13] Asghari, A., Zeinalabedinmalekmian, M., Azgomi, H., Alimoradi, M., & Ghaziantafrishi, S. (2025). Farmer ants optimization algorithm: A novel metaheuristic for solving discrete optimization problems. Information, 16(3), 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16030207

Published

2024-03-12

How to Cite

Rivandi, P. ., & Davoodian, F. . (2024). A Global Interaction–Inspired Metaheuristic for Neural Network Optimization in Geological Modeling by World Algorithm. Metaheuristic Algorithms With Applications, 1(1), 74-87. https://doi.org/10.48313/maa.v1i1.31

Similar Articles

11-20 of 27

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.