Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization in Carbon-Neutral Smart Cities: A Synthesis of Algorithmic Foundations, Application Domains, and Open Challenges

Authors

  • Maryam Khani * Department of Computer Engineering, Ayandegan University, Tonekabon.

https://doi.org/10.48313/maa.vi.94

Abstract

Cities account for approximately 70% of global Carbon-Dioxide (CO₂) emissions and three-quarters of primary energy consumption, which makes urban systems the central arena for any credible pathway to net-zero greenhouse-gas output by mid-century. Achieving carbon neutrality in a smart city simultaneously requires minimising energy demand, maximising renewable penetration, electrifying transport, retrofitting the existing building stock, and preserving quality of life under heterogeneous stakeholder preferences. These objectives are mutually conflicting, high-dimensional, non-convex, and constrained by physical, financial and regulatory couplings that render classical gradient-based methods inadequate. This paper synthesises more than two decades of research on Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization (EMO) as applied to carbon-neutral smart cities, organised around three contributions: 1) we provide a structured taxonomy of the principal EMO paradigms—domination-based (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), NSGA-III), decomposition-based (Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition (MOEA/D), Reference-Vector-guided Evolutionary Algorithm (RVEA)), and indicator-based (SMS-EMOA, Hypervolume Estimation Algorithm (HypE))—together with the benchmark suites (ZDT, DTLZ, CEC 2009, MaF) and quality indicators (Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), ε, spacing) that have become the de-facto evaluation protocol, 2) we review four canonical application domains—building energy retrofit, microgrid planning and dispatch, multimodal transportation, and integrated district-scale urban planning—and consolidate reported carbon-reduction ranges of 30–63%, 15–45%, 12–38%, and 20–50% respectively, and 3) we critically examine the field's principal limitations: benchmark over-fitting, weak reproducibility, limited preference articulation, and the absence of standardised uncertainty quantification. We close with a five-point research roadmap—surrogate-assisted EMO, adaptive operator selection, data-driven preference learning, federated urban optimization, and reproducibility infrastructure—intended to bridge the gap between algorithmic sophistication and policy-grade deployment.

Keywords:

Evolutionary multi-objective optimization, Carbon-neutral smart cities, Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-III, Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition, Pareto front, Building retrofit, Microgrid scheduling

References

  1. [1] Agency., I. E. (2021). Empowering cities for a net zero future. https://www.iea.org/reports/empowering-cities-for-a-net-zero-future
  2. [2] Commission., E. (2022). 100 climate-neutral and smart cities by 2030. Horizon Europe Mission. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe/missions-horizon-europe/climate-neutral-and-smart-cities_en
  3. [3] Cabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., & Castell, A. (2014). Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 29, 394–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037
  4. [4] Boussaïd, I., Lepagnot, J., & Siarry, P. (2013). A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Information sciences, 237, 82–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.02.041
  5. [5] Coello, C. A. C., Lamont, G. B., & Veldhuizen, D. A. Van. (2007). Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36797-2
  6. [6] Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. A. M. T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 6(2), 182-197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
  7. [7] Zhang, Q., & Li, H. (2007). MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 11(6), 712–731. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2007.892759
  8. [8] Zitzler, E., Deb, K., & Thiele, L. (2000). Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results. Evolutionary computation, 8(2), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1162/106365600568202
  9. [9] Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., & Zitzler, E. (2005). Scalable test problems for evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In Evolutionary multiobjective optimization: Theoretical advances and applications (pp. 105–145). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-137-7_6
  10. [10] Zhang, Q., Zhou, A., Zhao, S., Suganthan, P. N., Liu, W., Tiwari, S., & others. (2008). Multiobjective optimization test instances for the CEC 2009 special session and competition. https://scispace.com/papers/multiobjective-optimization-test-instances-for-the-cec-2009-4pzqqa5wk4
  11. [11] Ishibuchi, H., Setoguchi, Y., Masuda, H., & Nojima, Y. (2016). Performance of decomposition-based many-objective algorithms strongly depends on Pareto front shapes. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 21(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2016.2587749
  12. [12] Corne, D. W., Jerram, N. R., Knowles, J. D., & Oates, M. J. (2001). PESA-II: Region-based selection in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference (GECCO-2001) (pp. 283–290). Morgan Kaufmann. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239062948_PESA-II_Region-based_selection_in_evolutionary_multiobjective_optimization
  13. [13] Ishibuchi, H., Tsukamoto, N., & Nojima, Y. (2008). Evolutionary many-objective optimization: A short review. 2008 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC 2008) (pp. 2419–2426). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2008.4631121
  14. [14] Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., He, B. J., & Olanipekun, A. O. (2017). Examining issues influencing green building technologies adoption: The United States green building experts’ perspectives. Energy and buildings, 144, 320–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.060
  15. [15] Kitzberger, T., Kotik, J., & Pröll, T. (2022). Energy savings potential of occupancy-based HVAC control in laboratory buildings. Energy and buildings, 263, 112031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112031
  16. [16] Asadi, E., Da Silva, M. G., Antunes, C. H., & Dias, L. (2012). Multi-objective optimization for building retrofit strategies: A model and an application. Energy and buildings, 44, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.016
  17. [17] Huang, Y., He, G., Pu, Z., Zhang, Y., Luo, Q., & Ding, C. (2024). Multi-objective particle swarm optimization for optimal scheduling of household microgrids. Frontiers in energy research, 11, 1354869. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1354869
  18. [18] Wan, X., Lian, H., Ding, X., Peng, J., & Wu, Y. (2020). Hierarchical multiobjective dispatching strategy for the microgrid system using modified MOEA/D. Complexity, 2020(1), 4725808. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4725808
  19. [19] Dougier, N., Garambois, P., Gomand, J., & Roucoules, L. (2021). Multi-objective non-weighted optimization to explore new efficient design of electrical microgrids. Applied energy, 304, 117758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117758
  20. [20] Zhao, C., Tang, J., Gao, W., Zeng, Y., & Li, Z. (2024). Many-objective optimization of multi-mode public transportation under carbon emission reduction. Energy, 286, 129627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129627
  21. [21] Yao, Z., Wang, Z., & Ran, L. (2023). Smart charging and discharging of electric vehicles based on multi-objective robust optimization in smart cities. Applied energy, 343, 121185. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4206529
  22. [22] Aghaei Pour, P., Rodemann, T., Hakanen, J., & Miettinen, K. (2022). Surrogate assisted interactive multiobjective optimization in energy system design of buildings: P. Aghaei Pour et al. Optimization and engineering, 23(1), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-020-09587-8
  23. [23] Cui, T., Shi, Y., Wang, J., Ding, R., Li, J., & Li, K. (2025). Practice of an improved many-objective route optimization algorithm in a multimodal transportation case under uncertain demand. Complex & intelligent systems, 11(2), 136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-024-01725-4
  24. [24] Sharma, A., Singh, S. N., Serratos, M. M., Sahu, D., & Strezov, V. (2025). Urban energy transition in smart cities: A comprehensive review of sustainability and innovation. Sustainable futures, 10, 100940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100940
  25. [25] Lawrie, L. (2000). EnergyPlus: Energy simulation program. ASHRAE journal, 42, 49–56. https://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/dirpubs/46002.pdf
  26. [26] Coello, C. A. C. (2002). Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: A survey of the state of the art. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 191(11–12), 1245–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00323-1
  27. [27] Fan, Z. (2014). An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part I: Solving problems with box constraints. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 1–23. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/100851792/k2012009-libre.pdf
  28. [28] Deb, K., Agrawal, R. B., & others. (1995). Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex systems, 9(2), 115–148. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Simulated-Binary-Crossover-for-Continuous-Search-Deb-Agrawal/b8ee6b68520ae0291075cb1408046a7dff9dd9ad
  29. [29] Mostafazadeh, F., Eirdmousa, S. J., & Tavakolan, M. (2023). Energy, economic and comfort optimization of building retrofits considering climate change: A simulation-based NSGA-III approach. Energy and buildings, 280, 112721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112721
  30. [30] Cheng, R., Jin, Y., Olhofer, M., & Sendhoff, B. (2016). A reference vector guided evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 20(5), 773–791. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2016.2519378
  31. [31] Bai, Z., Chen, J., Jiang, S., Yuan, Y., Hu, W., & Zheng, B. (2020). Multi-objective optimization of a wind-solar microgrid system based on the improved NSGA-II method. Applied energy symposium 2020: Low carbon cities and urban energy systems, 1-6. https://www.energy-proceedings.org/wp-content/uploads/enerarxiv/1600013781.pdf
  32. [32] Beume, N., Naujoks, B., & Emmerich, M. (2007). SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume. European journal of operational research, 181(3), 1653–1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.008
  33. [33] Bader, J., & Zitzler, E. (2011). HypE: An algorithm for fast hypervolume-based many-objective optimization. Evolutionary computation, 19(1), 45–76. https://doi.org/10.1162/EVCO_a_00009
  34. [34] Jin, Y. (2011). Surrogate-assisted evolutionary computation: Recent advances and future challenges. Swarm and evolutionary computation, 1(2), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2011.05.001
  35. [35] Duan, Z., Li, B., Zi, Y., & Yao, G. (2024). Building retrofit multiobjective optimization using neural networks and genetic algorithm three for energy, carbon and comfort. Scientific reports, 15, 38076. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21871-0
  36. [36] Shi, Y., & Chen, P. (2024). Energy retrofitting of hospital buildings considering climate change: An approach integrating automated machine learning with NSGA-III for multi-objective optimization. Energy and buildings, 319, 114571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114571
  37. [37] Demšar, J. (2006). Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. Journal of machine learning research, 7(Jan), 1–30. https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume7/demsar06a/demsar06a.pdf
  38. [38] Mersmann, O., Trautmann, H., Naujoks, B., & Weihs, C. (2010). Benchmarking evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms. Proceedings of the IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC 2010) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2010.5586241
  39. [39] International Energy Agency. (2021). Energy efficiency 2021. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/cfb80e1e-en
  40. [40] Lee, H., & Heo, Y. (2022). Simplified data-driven models for model predictive control of residential buildings. Energy and buildings, 265, 112067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112067
  41. [41] Xue, Q., Wang, Z., & Chen, Q. (2022). Multi-objective optimization of building design for life cycle cost and CO₂ emissions: A case study of a low-energy residential building in a severe cold climate. Building simulation, 15(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0796-5
  42. [42] Wei, H., Jiao, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, W., & Zhang, T. (2024). Optimal retrofitting scenarios of multi-objective energy-efficient historic building under different national goals integrating energy simulation, reduced order modelling and NSGA-II algorithm. Building simulation, 17(6), 933–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-024-1122-9
  43. [43] Deng, J., Yang, N., Wang, C., Yin, D., Xiaoyong, Z., & He, Y. (2023). Study on staged heat transfer law of coal spontaneous combustion in deep mines. Energy, 285, 129485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129485
  44. [44] Wang, Y., Lin, S., Yang, Z., Sun, X., & Liu, M. (2018). Multi-objective stochastic dynamic optimal dispatch algorithm of microgrid. Transactions of China electrotechnical society, 33(10), 2196–2207. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.170496
  45. [45] International Energy Agency. (2023). CO₂ emissions in 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2022
  46. [46] Xiao, M., Chen, L., Feng, H., Peng, Z., & Long, Q. (2024). Smart city public transportation route planning based on multi-objective optimization: A review. Archives of computational methods in engineering, 31(6), 3351–3375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10076-9
  47. [47] Jiang, C., Jing, Z., Ji, T., & Wu, Q. (2018). Optimal location of PEVCSs using MAS and ER approach. IET generation, transmission & distribution, 12(20), 4377–4387. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1907
  48. [48] Hong, T., Chen, Y., Luo, X., Luo, N., & Lee, S. H. (2020). Ten questions on urban building energy modeling. Building and environment, 168, 106508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106508
  49. [49] Keirstead, J., Jennings, M., & Sivakumar, A. (2012). A review of urban energy system models: Approaches, challenges and opportunities. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 16(6), 3847–3866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.047
  50. [50] Chang, M., Thellufsen, J. Z., Zakeri, B., Pickering, B., Pfenninger, S., Lund, H., & Østergaard, P. A. (2021). Trends in tools and approaches for modelling the energy transition. Applied energy, 290, 116731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116731
  51. [51] Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997). No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 1(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.585893
  52. [52] López-Ibáñez, M., Branke, J., & Paquete, L. (2021). Reproducibility in evolutionary computation. ACM transactions on evolutionary learning and optimization, 1(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3466624
  53. [53] Miettinen, K. (1999). Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://files.isec.pt/DOCUMENTOS/SERVICOS/BIBLIO/INFORMA%C3%87%C3%95ES%20ADICIONAIS/Nonlinear-multiojective_Miettinen.pdf
  54. [54] Xin, B., Chen, L., Chen, J., Ishibuchi, H., Hirota, K., & Liu, B. (2018). Interactive multiobjective optimization: A review of the state-of-the-art. IEEE access, 6, 41256–41279. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2856832
  55. [55] He, C., Zhou, Y., Liu, X., Nan, L., Liu, T., & Wu, L. (2025). Reliability-constrained distributionally robust expansion planning of integrated electricity-gas distribution system with demand response. Energy, 321, 135409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135409
  56. [56] Qin, A. K., Huang, V. L., & Suganthan, P. N. (2008). Differential evolution algorithm with strategy adaptation for global numerical optimization. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 13(2), 398–417. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2008.927706
  57. [57] Kairouz, P., & McMahan, H. B. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and trends in machine learning, 14(1–2), 1–210. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000083

Downloads

Published

2025-12-21

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Metaheuristic Algorithms with Applications

Section

Articles

Categories

How to Cite

Khani, M. (2025). Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization in Carbon-Neutral Smart Cities: A Synthesis of Algorithmic Foundations, Application Domains, and Open Challenges. Metaheuristic Algorithms With Applications, 2(4), 353-372. https://doi.org/10.48313/maa.vi.94

Similar Articles

1-10 of 69

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.